no_fastolfe (
no_fastolfe) wrote2011-10-17 07:04 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
8.0 Day in the Library (Spamlogs)
[Private to Sherlock]
At your convenience. I will understand if the way is impassable, however. I found myself among a wetland on my way this morning.
Library Spams]
[Vasilia is in the library, shelving books and generally getting the lay of the stacks. When she sees something out of place she goes for it-- surgical, putting it back in order as if she blames it for being out. Patterns, she's always been good at patterns.]
[OOC: Sorry about the lateness, Nemo!]
At your convenience. I will understand if the way is impassable, however. I found myself among a wetland on my way this morning.
Library Spams]
[Vasilia is in the library, shelving books and generally getting the lay of the stacks. When she sees something out of place she goes for it-- surgical, putting it back in order as if she blames it for being out. Patterns, she's always been good at patterns.]
[OOC: Sorry about the lateness, Nemo!]
Spam
Very little here makes actual sense.
Spam
[She crosses her arms, the bridge of her nose wrinkling with irritation.]
Spam
[Though her idea is more than a little unsettling. He frowns, how would he know? Does a construct believe it's real right up until the point it ceases to exist?]
Spam
Spam
Re: Spam
And beyond the general case, remember that we are speaking specifically about an individual of great value to me. I will not easily be convinced of his non-existence.
Spam
Ah, well. Great value. [He doesn't make that into a question, just lets it hang there.]
Spam
Returning to your hypothesis: which members of the barge do you consider only fictional constructs?
Spam
Myself.
[Of course he isn't the best example what with the time period difference, but there's his alternate self to point out.]
Spam
And the ramifications of being a fictional construct, and what this means about your competencies and validity as a thinking being, if you please?
Spam
It certainly raises interesting questions of pre-destination and free will, but then those are much the same questions theologians have attempted to reconcile for centuries. Only in my case, I know there is a God, and his name is Conan-Doyle. [He may make a good show of not being fazed, but that last is said with more than a hint of bitterness.]
Re: Spam
I refuse to compromise my few points of stability because you are apparently fictional, sir. I will not take it into consideration with Rinzler, nor with you nor anyone else. And you cannot convince me to do otherwise. [Which, besides being imperious and self centered, is also an admission that she depends on Sherlock to some extent. But then, she's darkly convinced that he's deduced it somehow already, so no harm in admission.]