action.

Date: 2011-10-23 04:22 pm (UTC)
no_fastolfe: (Default)
From: [personal profile] no_fastolfe
Why would you design a robot-- a specific machine, although more than a mere machine, with a specific purpose-- to be able to experience pain? For the thwarting of your ambitions is pain, the rejection and denial of others is pain. The goal is not to create a new life, to mimic humanity. The goal is to create a helper.

You can hurt an Ascenion robot-- if you will pardon my clumsy analog-- 'hurt' them by leading them into conflict, in which they cannot obey their guiding Laws. You can, if you know how, order even an advanced robot with high self-preservation potential to destroy itself.

And yet if you do that you do not deserve access to robots! If they lack the range of responses of humanity than it is also humanity's responsibility to provide the structure they need. Not to change them-- but to change their operating environment. You would not set a harvesting combine in the ocean and expect it to work. No: you place it on an agricultural plot and do not ask it to choose if it would like to swim instead.

I think the question I would ask-- in much shorter terms-- is this: does a sapient being deserve, by default, 'Free Will?'
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

no_fastolfe: (Default)
no_fastolfe

September 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9 101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 06:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios